High Court Holds Ex-CEO Responsible for MFS Financial Collapse

The High Court of Australia ruled that Michael Christodoulou King, former CEO and executive director of MFS Ltd was an “officer” of MFS Investment Management Pty Ltd (MFSIM) and that he was responsible for the acts of the subsidiaries, including the MFS financial collapse that resulted to billions of investor losses.

High Court Holds Ex-CEO Responsible for MFS Financial Collapse


Mr King and a partner started MFS as a small mortgage company in 2000. By 2007, the company has expanded into tourism and travel-related services (“the Stella Group”) and funds management and financial services.

Premium Income Fund (“PIF”) was the largest registered managed investment scheme in the MFS Group and its “flagship fund.” As of the third quarter of 2007, PIF had total funds under management from retail investors of approximately $787 million. MFSIM was the responsible entity of PIF.

In June 2007, MFSIM entered a $200 million facility with the Royal Bank of Scotland Plc for PIF. In November of that year, MFSIM and senior personnel in the MFS Group arranged to draw down $150 million under the RBS loan agreement.

Of the $150 million, $103 million was paid to Fortress Credit Corporation (Australia) II Pty Ltd., which extended a $250 million loan to MFS Castle Pty Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS Ltd. The Fortress loan was supposed to be paid by the proceeds of the sale of the Stella Group or a corporate banking facility but none of these two options materialized.

According to court documents, there was no agreement by which MFSIM received any consideration for the payment of $130 million. The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) said that PIF was thereby exposed to the risk that PIF’s money would not be restored to it – there was no evident promise of repayment, let alone one that was properly secured.

Mr King stepped down as MFSIM’s director in February 2007, but his companies continued trading. In January of 2008, MFS Group split into two and prices of shares crashed to about $1, resulting in billions of investor losses. Ultimately, this caused the MFS Group’s financial collapse.

ASIC’s case

Relevant to the current ruling, ASIC alleged that:

  1. Mr King was liable for the financial collapse under s 601FD of the Act as an “officer” of MFSIM
  2. Mr King remained an “officer” of MFSIM until the time of the financial collapse because he fell within para (b)(ii) of the definition of “officer of a corporation” in s 9 of the Act, being “a person … who has the capacity to affect significantly the corporation’s financial standing”
  3. Mr King was a person who had that capacity because he was the CEO and an executive director of MFS Ltd with overall responsibility for MFSIM
  4. Craig White, the deputy CEO of MFS Ltd and an executive director of MFSIM, had customarily acted by following Mr King’s instructions and wishes in that role.

High Court’s ruling

The High Court agreed with the ASIC and substantially held that the term “officer”

  1. under paragraph (b)(ii) in s 9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), it is not limited to those who hold or occupy a named office, or a recognised position with rights and duties attached to it
  2. includes a person who has engaged in certain conduct who has a certain kind of capacity, or who has, or had a certain influence on the directors of the corporation

Given the facts and circumstances of this case, the High Court concluded that Mr King was a person who could significantly affect the financial standing of MFSIM.

The Court held that Mr King acted as “overall boss” of MFS Group and assumed “overall responsibility” for MFSIM.

Read the full-text of the High Court of Australia’s ruling on the high-profile financial collapse case here

Share this article
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x